No, thats not enirely true at all. I think you are generalizing massively there. Most gamers are not hating on GTA 4 just because they think it's cool in an alternative way to hate on anything popular. Most of them are massive GTA fans like myself who just feel kinda annoyed and letdown by GTA 4 and with good reason. I still think GTA 4 is a very good game and I thought it the graphics looked amazing with all the rich detail and realistic-looking environments. However, GTA 4 is still a bi...
I agree with both of you with regards to certain points.
I thought the ending was brilliant and well-thought out, even though it felt kinda sad. It had the perfect ending of how a Western movie should end - the main character gets shot down and killed in a blaze of glory, just as it happens in most classic Western action movies.
I kinda see what OSU__Gamer is saying. I did'nt feel too much for John Marston's wife and son, simply because I did'...
Awwwwww poor you. Here you are, take a whole box of man-sized tissues to wipe those salty tears that run down your cheeks non-stop everytime you come on here! LOL
This is getting very laughable now. You 360 fanatics (not fans) keep bringing up this silly subject like its the only thing left you have against the PS3 to boast about. Damn whenever you 360 fanatics bring up this RDR issue, it's so clear to see the desperation in your comments and the fact that you're all clutching at straws real hard.
The PS3 version of Red Dead is not at all sub-HD and this was never officially cofirmed by Rockstar as fact. I own the PS3 version...
I'm a PS3 owner and most of my games are pretty much third-person action/adventure games.
That was one of biggest complaints about GTA 4. I just hated the fact that in GTA 4 you always had to start some trouble yourself just to see a street brawl or gunfight between NPCs, and for most part the gunfights took place between the gang member NPCs and the police. You very, very rarely saw two different gang memebers in the streets have shoot-outs and fights with each other that did not involve you. You hardly saw any NPCs commit crimes on each other, like carjackings, muggings, hold-up...
I'm simply advising someone who is interested in RDR about the game and buying it, I were'nt starting no console war. If you read my earlier post, I said NOTHING about which version ofRed Dead Redemption is better. If you think the 360 version is better. If you think the 360 version is better then tats fine. But just because you and some others say it is, it dont mean thats a fact amd not everyone else will see it that way. Thats your opinion. My point to him was not which one was bet...
Get Red Dead Redemption now. The game is brilliant and original. There is just so much side activities and missions to do apart from the main storyline and the natural environments in the game just look so realistically stunning. Simply just wondering around the remote wilderness and observing the animals feels so real that it's like being a National Geographic TV programme. I love the fact that you have dangerous animals like cougars, bears and wolves to contend with aswell as human enem...
I bet most of you 360 fanatics have not even seen the PS3 version of Red Dead Redemption. All you can do is believe these bogus screenshot comparisons, and tell yourselves the 360 version is better. Ok if it makes you happy then fine, but we PS3 owners know the real deal. As much as you wish the PS3 versions of GTA 4 and Red Dead to be bad, they are not and they look brilliant and play great. In addition to this, the PS3 has exclusives that will graphically blow away anything the 360 has to o...
It depends on the person and what they see. I've read the reviews for the GTA 4 and quite a number of gaming sites like IGN, GamesRadar and 1UP stated that the PS3 version looked slightly better, check this yourself. None of the major gaming sites have stated that the PS3 version of Red Dead Redemption has bad graphics, and none of them have stated that the 360 version looks better - all I've seen are images of the PS3 version doctored to look bad in screenshot comparisons by biased g...
GTA 4 was kinda of disappointing in a way, and the reasons for this has been stated a million times over already (missing features, repetitive missions etc). Most real GTA fans will agree with this. However, I still think GTA 4 is a very good game with stunning graphics, and for most part I enjoyed playing it to the end. I also played and completed the Episodes of Liberty City which kinda made up for the slight disappointment of the main game, I really enjoyed playing The Ballad of Gay Tony e...
I would recommend buying this game. I have it for the PS3 and I'm really enjoying it. The graphics are not the best that I've seen, but they are still brilliant and stunning to look at. The game plays great aswell. I have not encountered that many bugs, only slight framerate issues and a very minor amount of pop-in, but it does not really affect the game that bad in anyway. There is a nice variety of missions in the storyline that I have done so far, but the best variety comes in the ...
It's them damn cougars - they frighten the sh*t outta me. They come at you from nowhere when you are in the woods.
Show me concrete eveidence that Red Dead is sub-HD on the PS3. I want to see an official statement from Rockstar confirming the PS3 version of Red Dead is sub-HD. If you cant provide it, then I suggest you close your mouth and be quiet. Stop making stupid claims that you cannot back. I have the PS3 version and it does not look sub-HD at all, it looks just fine as native 720p.
The submarine and cliff waterfall part in Uncharted 1 simply just left me stunned. I can still remember seeing the crisp, clear and detailed graphics showing the lush, green tropical vegetation and the photo-realistic rock and water effects. Uncharted 1 was the game that truly made me realise that I had now entered the HD era of gaming.
@ Ether - yeah, that part in Uncharted 2 was amazing aswell. The view from the hotel top looking across the city and the mountains was incr...
I have it on the PS3, it's a brilliant game.
You said this earlier, if one scrolls up:
" The technical analysis is pretty conclusive: if you've got the choice of buying the game for either console, Xbox 360 is the version of Red Dead you should buy....whats your problem with that ?. ive got both consoles and so always enjoy the best versions. I can only imagine the shit the 360 owners would have got if it was the other way round. "
And now you are telling me:
" ...
I tried to buy a copy of Red Dead Redemption for my PS3 from the main GAME store in Oxford Street in central London, and they were sold out but, they still had 360 versions in stock. An employee told me they had sold out the PS3 version in all the GAME stores across London. I stupidly did not pre-order it like I did with GTA 4 when it came out 2 years ago.
The game is very good, I'm really enjoying it so far. The map is big, and the natural environments are so realistic...
Not ONE of these haters can conclusively prove their claims that the PS3 version of Red Dead Redemption is sub-HD/640p. Rockstar have not made an official statement or quote confirming these sub-HD claims. It says 720p on the back of the PS3 version's box and it sure looks like native 720p graphics to me on my Sony Bravia HDTV. All these haters wanna do is cling on to some very flimsy, so-called evidence from a bunch of geeky, pixel-counting guys no one has ever seen or really heard of fr...
I played Mafia 1 on the PS2 and I did'nt particularly like it. I felt the driving was too slow aswell. I hope Mafia 2 is a lot better, it would be good to have a great game with this theme.